The case for CSEEF, in five parts.
New to the idea? Watch CSEEF explained in 7 steps first. This page is the detail behind it.
One tax bill. Two receipts.
The company pays its tax exactly as it does today. The federal tax bill is then used as a measuring stick to set a small number of new shares for the fund.
Measure
Take the company's federal tax liability for the year. Only companies above $100M qualify. No tax, no shares.
Issue
The company issues new non-voting shares worth 25% of that liability, priced 5% below the market. No cash changes hands.
Hold
The fund keeps the shares permanently and lives on their dividends. Its stake in any company stops at 5%.
Fiscal 2024, from the annual reports.
Pick a company. Every figure below comes from its own filings, run through the formula.
=
One formula for every qualifying company, set once in law. No negotiation, and no annual renewal.
Shares are issued once. Dividends arrive every year after.
If the mechanism had started in 2019 at just the ten largest companies, the fund would have received $74.9M in dividends in its first year. By 2024 it would be receiving $809.2M a year, and still climbing.
Over the six years: $2.43B in dividends, with every share still owned.
What the fund takes is academic. What it builds is not.
Someone pays. Here is exactly who, and how much.
The cost falls on existing shareholders, as dilution. In 2024, RBC would have issued 2.55M new shares to the fund: 0.18% of the company.
If you own 100 RBC shares, worth $16,839 at the end of 2024, that is about $1.01 of that year's dividends. Companies already dilute owners this way to pay their executives. RBC's share-based pay cost $959M in 2024.
The dilution disappears inside the growth.
Call it what you like. Just don't call it nationalization. It has a cap.
Capitalism doesn't need replacing. It needs a tweak.
- ✓Non-voting
- ✓Capped at 5% per company
- ✓Never sold on the market
- ✓No new cash tax
- ✓No tax, no shares